Patients’ Interrogative Choices in Chinese Doctor-Patient Conversations

Xi LUO

Abstract


Conversations between doctors and patients are processed by a series of information exchanges, by which the interpersonal meaning is realized. Mood is one of important resources to realize interpersonal meaning, especially interrogative Mood. It is the mostly favored choice for patients in doctor-patient conversations. In this article, patients’ interrogative choices are analyzed based on the data collected from Chinese doctor-patient conversations, concluding the characteristics of Chinese patients’ choices of questions and the effect of their interrogative choices on the construing of interpersonal meaning.


Keywords


Patient; Doctor-patient conversation; Interrogative

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bensing J. M. (1991). Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care. An observation study into affective and instrumental behavior in general practice. Dissertation. NIVEL, Utrecht.

Braman, A. C., & Gomez, R. G. (2004). Patient personality predicts preference for relationships with doctors. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(04), 815-826.

Hall J. A., Roter, D. L., & Katz, N. R. (1988). Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med. Care, 26, 657.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994/2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Harmsen, J. A. M. (2003). When cultures meet in medical practice (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). Erasmus University.

Moral, R. R., Alamo, M. M., Jurado M. A., & Torres, L. P. (2001). Effectiveness of a learner-centred training programme for primary care physicians in using a patientcentred consultation style. Family Practice, (01), 60-63. Roter, D. L., & Hall, J. A. (1992). Doctors talking with patients, patients talking with doctors. Auburn House, Westport, CT.

Smith, R. C., & Hoppe, R. B. (1991). The patient’s story: Integrating the patient- and physician-centered approaches to interviewing. Ann. Intern. Med., 115, 470.

Van Wieringen, J. C. M., Harmens, J. A. M., & Bruijnzeels, M. A. (2002). Intercultural communication in general practice. European Journal of Public Health, 12 (01), 63-6.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3968/n

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) Studies in Sociology of Science




Share us to:   


Reminder

  • How to do online submission to another Journal?
  • If you have already registered in Journal A, then how can you submit another article to Journal B? It takes two steps to make it happen:

1. Register yourself in Journal B as an Author

  • Find the journal you want to submit to in CATEGORIES, click on “VIEW JOURNAL”, “Online Submissions”, “GO TO LOGIN” and “Edit My Profile”. Check “Author” on the “Edit Profile” page, then “Save”.

2. Submission

  • Go to “User Home”, and click on “Author” under the name of Journal B. You may start a New Submission by clicking on “CLICK HERE”.


We only use three mailboxes as follows to deal with issues about paper acceptance, payment and submission of electronic versions of our journals to databases:
caooc@hotmail.com; sss@cscanada.net; sss@cscanada.org

 Articles published in Studies in Sociology of Science are licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC-BY).

STUDIES IN SOCIOLOGY OF SCIENCE Editorial Office

Address: 9375 Rue de Roissy Brossard, Québec, J4X 3A1, Canada

Telephone: 1-514-558 6138
Website: Http://www.cscanada.net; Http://www.cscanada.org
E-mail:caooc@hotmail.com

Copyright © 2010 Canadian Research & Development Centre of Sciences and Cultures